Utilizing Peptide SPOT Arrays to Identify Protein Interactions
- Abstract
- Table of Contents
- Materials
- Figures
- Literature Cited
Abstract
?
SPOT arrays consist of synthesized peptides 12? to 18?amino acids long, with overlapping sequences that cover the entire sequence of a protein, covalently linked to a solid support. This unit describes how to construct peptide SPOT arrays, biotinylate recombinant proteins, and conduct overlay assays to identify binding interactions. In addition, directions describing how to analyze results to determine single amino acid binding contributions are included. The two techniques in this unit describe how to scan protein sequences to find binding motifs and how to conduct site?directed mutagenesis studies. Curr. Protoc. Protein Sci. 51:18.10.1?18.10.9. ? 2008 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Keywords: peptides; arrays; protein?protein interactions
? ? ? ? GO TO THE FULL PROTOCOL: PDF or HTML at Wiley Online Library Table of Contents
- Introduction
- Basic Protocol 1: Utilizing Peptide Spot Arrays to Define Binding Sites
- Commentary
- Literature Cited
- Figures
? ? ? ? GO TO THE FULL PROTOCOL: PDF or HTML at Wiley Online Library Materials
Basic Protocol 1: Utilizing Peptide Spot Arrays to Define Binding Sites ? Materials
|
GO TO THE FULL PROTOCOL: PDF or HTML at Wiley Online Library Figures
-
? Figure 18.10.1 Schematic representation of peptide overlay procedure. -
? Figure 18.10.2 Determine binding contribution of a single amino acid. To determine the contribution of Q in this sequence, the binding intensities of the 12 peptides (SPOTs 25 to 36) containing Q are averaged. -
? Figure 18.10.3 Binding site determination. (A ) Example of autoradiogram. (B ) Example of graphical representation of binding data. -
? Figure 18.10.4 Site‐directed mutagenesis. At every position, an alanine, glutamine, or tyrosine was substituted for the naturally occurring amino acid. Arrows mark critical residues where binding was significantly reduced upon mutagenesis.
Videos
Literature Cited
Literature Cited | |
?? | Alto, N.M., Soderling, S.H., Hoshi, N., Langeberg, L.K., Fayos, R., Jennings, P.A., and Scott, J.D. 2003. Bioinformatic design of A‐kinase anchoring protein‐in silico: A potent and selective peptide antagonist of type II protein kinase A anchoring. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 100:4445‐4450. |
?? | Cushman, I., Palzkill, T., and Moore, M.S. 2006. Using peptide arrays to define nuclear carrier binding sites on nucleoporins. Methods 39:329‐341. |
?? | Frank, R. 2002. The SPOT‐synthesis technique. Synthetic peptide arrays on membrane supports—Principles and applications. J. Immunol. Methods 267:13‐26. |
?? | Knoblauch, N.T., Rudiger, S., Schonfeld, H.J., Driessen, A.J., Schneider‐Mergener, J., and Bukau, B. 1999. Substrate specificity of the SecB chaperone. J. Biol. Chem. 274:34219‐34225. |
?? | Reineke, U., Volkmer‐Engert, R., and Schneider‐Mergener, J. 2001. Applications of peptide arrays prepared by the SPOT‐technology. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 12:59‐64. |
?? | Rudiger, S., Germeroth, L., Schneider‐Mergener, J., and Bukau, B. 1997. Substrate specificity of the DnaK chaperone determined by screening cellulose‐bound peptide libraries. EMBO J. 16:1501‐1507. |
?? | Rudiger, S., Mayer, M.P., Schneider‐Mergener, J., and Bukau, B. 2000. Modulation of substrate specificity of the DnaK chaperone by alteration of a hydrophobic arch. J. Mol. Biol. 304:245‐251. |
?? | Wenschuh, H., Volkmer‐Engert, R., Schmidt, M., Schulz, M., Schneider‐Mergener, J., and Reineke, U. 2000. Coherent membrane supports for parallel microsynthesis and screening of bioactive peptides. Biopolymers 55:188‐206. |
?? | Yaffe, M.B. and Cantley, L.C. 2000. Mapping specificity determinants for protein‐protein association using protein fusions and random peptide libraries. Methods Enzymol. 328:157‐170. |
GO TO THE FULL PROTOCOL: PDF or HTML at Wiley Online Library ?